There are three different feeds you can subscribe to, which correspond to the different types of content. Links are short posts of one or two paragraphs which simply share an interesting link with brief commentary. Entries are longer prose pieces of at least 300 words. If you subscribe to everything, you'll get everything I publish, including approximately one entry and five links a week. Comments are not included in the everything feed. If you want to subscribe to comments, you can keep up with the conversation using the comments feed.

Timestamp
Published at 07:03 PM on January 25, 2009
Comments
There are 4 comments on this post. Add yours.
Content
Spying Suit 1

You can’t change the world if you ignore it.

Among the progressive base, there seems to be this idea that corporations and society are inherently bad. This attitude, which leads to growing isolation, doesn’t help to advance progressive causes. Instead, it just stigmatizes good ideas as dangerously radical.

Make no mistake: this world isn’t perfect. Society, at all levels, is rampart with corruption, greed, and other “sins.”2 Unfortunately, the typical progressive/radical response to this is to simply abandon society. But in reality, substantive change only comes from the inside. We can’t all be Thoreau. To change society, you have to be part of it.

In a plethora of situations, I run into the conflict between ideals and practicality. It is better to build a good compromise than to ride the high horse into the sunset. Though some call it Machiavellian, I call it pragmatic. Everything should be analyzed as a cost vs. value equation. What is the cost to my moral integrity? What is the benefit to society?

The world isn’t painted in black and white, but in shades of grey. Nothing is inherently evil and nothing is inherently bad. Corporations are just a collection of people, and all people are just trying to do what they think is best.

I run into this conflict all the time, both in work and school. Sure, I don’t believe there is any point to an assignment. But that doesn’t mean I won’t do it: in the end, it’s better for me to ace a pointless class than to fail it. It’s better to accept that job at Goliath National Bank than to barely make ends meet elsewhere.

Society doesn’t give a damn about you unless you give a damn about it.

It’s fun to wear band shirts, but eventually we have to “suit up.”3

Notes
  1. Photo by laverrue on Flickr
  2. Sin is a convenient word, but I wish it wasn't overly religious.
  3. Framing from spgreenlaw, who has a rather different take on this.

Comments

There are 4 comments on this post. You can add your own below.
Name
Content
I can’t help but feel this is aimed at me at least a little. :P There will be a response forthcoming, once I finish/forget about the ten other posts I’m halfway through writing. One minor quibble, for the time being: save for some anarcho-primitivists, I don’t know of anyone who doesn’t give a damn about society. See the radical IWW’s great line from their preamble: “we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old.”
Name
Content

@spgreenlaw: Certainly don’t take it as an attack, but you did help to inspire this. While I don’t think anyone is entirely devoid of society, I do know many people who actively work to avoid it as much as possible. For the record, this is a consistent theme which I have found beyond just my discussions with you. I look forward to your response.

Name
Content
I definitely don’t view it as an attack, I was actually quite pleased to see it. I love, some might say live for, any sort of interaction between divergent or opposing views. It’s one of the best ways to grow intellectually.
Name
Content

@spgreenlaw: Agreed. That’s why I love our back-and-forth so much.

Respond

Respond to this entry with your remarkable insights.

(Required)
(Required)

(will not be published)