The crucial flaw of NCLB, in my opinion, is that is fails to inspire. The law has many other faults, of course, including its lack of funding and regimented focus on testing. However, the root problem is that NCLB is attempting to use an evolutionary methodology for a truly revolutionary goal – almost total proficiency. There is no easily articulated goal which all citizens can rally around: the standards are convoluted and the metrics for success are continually redefined in contradiction with themselves. Doug Noon perfectly captures this, in the context of Kennedy’s space program:1
If we’d have used an NCLB-style approach to the Apollo moon mission, President Kennedy would have simply ordered NASA to fly conventional airplanes higher and higher until they fell out of the sky, and then blamed the pilots for lacking the will and the know-how to get the job done.
How can we reach for the moon with education?
Respond
Respond to this entry with your remarkable insights.
Comments
Deborah Vrabel
morgante
@Deborah: Thanks for your kind words. I think students certainly can help to craft a strategy and message for reaching the “moon.” Unfortunately, any such attempt requires the support of teachers, administrators, and politicians. In the current economic client, politicians tend to attack education as an out-of-control expense rather than thinking about how to improve it. People once (and still do) say the same thing about space exploration… This approach is terribly short-sighted, as long-term improvement only comes through investment in the minds and innovations of the future. Once again, thanks for stopping by!
Tom
morgante
@Tom: I absolutely agree: having states decide the standards is entirely paradoxical to the stated goal of having all states reach a common goal. We’re actually seeing states with poorer education systems get the top scores by lowering standards while states like Massachusetts struggle to meet the high goals they have set. A “reformed” NCLB would be funded and would share common standards—though said standards wouldn’t necessarily have to be exactly the same.
Thanks for stopping by!